Inpatient Consultants Of North Carolina, P.C. v. Goad et al
Inpatient Consultants Of North Carolina, P.C. |
Dr. Bradley J. Goad, Dr. Jeffrey Garland, Carrie Burnette, GAPS Health, Premier Geriatric Solutions, PLLC, GAPS Health NC, PLLC, Elite Practice Management & Consulting LLC, Dr. Vanessa Jean Sturgill Fant, Dr. David Campbell, Dr. Victor Bell, Jessi Dalton, Matthew Fife, Jamie Wood Smith, Lisa Elmore Curtis, Arneda F. Lyons, Holly Hullett Roy, Stacy Johnson Gambill, Farrah Russell Vaughn, Ashley Cupp, Amanda Lanier, Ryan Carlton, Viola Jones, Jessica L. Van Auken, Michie Bolden, Natasha Obrist and Candace Young |
7:2022cv00199 |
April 7, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Michael F Urbanski |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.