Taylor v. Clarke
| Monte DeShawn Taylor |
| Harold W. Clarke |
| 7:2022cv00230 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Certified True Copies of State Court Record(s) received electronically from Supreme Court of Virginia, case number(s) 200744; 211222 (Records available for viewing in the clerks office.) (aab)
|
|
Filing 9
Certified True Copies of State Court Record(s) received electronically from Roanoke City Circuit Court, case number(s) CR18-281 thru 288 (Records available for viewing in the clerks office.) (aab)
|
|
Filing 8
Certified True Copies of State Court Record(s) received electronically from Court of Appeals of Virginia, case number(s) 1450-19-3 (Records available for viewing in the clerks office.) (aab)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Quinlan Adelfio on behalf of Harold W. Clarke (Adelfio, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 6
Acknowledgment of Receipt as to #5 Order of Prisoner Service (2254), filed by Harold W. Clarke.(Adelfio, Katherine)
|
|
Filing 5
Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2254 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Monte DeShawn Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 6/3/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing Fee Received $ 5.00, receipt number 700072075 (aab)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Stay Case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 5/17/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC 2254; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Consent to Fee OR Pay the $5.00 Filing Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Responses due by 6/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 5/17/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Stay and Abeyance by Monte DeShawn Taylor. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) (Page 36 not included)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Monte DeShawn Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Exhibits A-F, #3 Cover Letter)(aab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Monte DeShawn Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Harold W. Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Quinlan Adelfio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
