Allen v. Good et al
| Karsten O. Allen |
| Sally Good, Sgt. Widener, Ofc. Rose, Nurse Compton, Nurse Practitioner A. Ball, Warden Israel Hamilton and Harold Clarke |
| 7:2022cv00351 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Notice of Declination of Service as to Nurse Compton and Nurse Practitioner A. Ball.(Sessoms, Stacie)
|
|
Filing 13
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Harold Clarke, Ofc. Rose, Sgt. Widener, Israel Hamilton, Sally Good. Harold Clarke waiver sent on 8/10/2022, answer due 10/11/2022; Ofc. Rose waiver sent on 8/10/2022, answer due 10/11/2022; Sgt. Widener waiver sent on 8/10/2022, answer due 10/11/2022; Israel Hamilton waiver sent on 8/10/2022, answer due 10/11/2022; Sally Good waiver sent on 8/10/2022, answer due 10/11/2022.(Sessoms, Stacie)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Stacie Ann Sessoms on behalf of Harold Clarke, Sally Good, Israel Hamilton, Ofc. Rose, Sgt. Widener (Sessoms, Stacie)
|
|
Filing 11
Clerks Notice of Service (OAG 1983) sent to Sally Good, et al on 8/10/2022. Pursuant to the agreement of electronic service. Waiver of Service due by 9/9/2022.(aab)
|
|
Filing 10
Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants A. Ball, Harold Clarke, Nurse Compton, Sally Good, Israel Hamilton, Ofc. Rose, Sgt. Widener re #1 Complaint filed by Karsten O. Allen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/10/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 9
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Karsten O. Allen (slt)
|
|
Filing 8
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; denying as moot #4 motion for extension of time; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 7/26/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) Modified on 7/26/2022, including ruling on motion for extension. (aab).
|
|
Filing 7
Letter regarding Motion for Extension of Time #4 by Karsten O. Allen. (slt)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Account Report by Karsten O. Allen (slt)
|
|
Filing 5
Statement of Assets by Karsten O. Allen (slt)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Order Prisoner Conditionally Filed by Karsten O. Allen. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account;Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days Responses due by 7/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 6/29/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Karsten O. Allen. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against A. Ball, Harold Clarke, Nurse Compton, Sally Good, Israel Hamilton, Ofc. Rose, Sgt. Widener, filed by Karsten O. Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(tvt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
