Jaswal v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
| Glenda N. Jaswal |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., |
| 7:2022cv00372 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certified True Copies of State Court Record(s) received electronically from Roanoke City Circuit, case number(s) CL22001091-00 (slt) |
Filing 5
Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Circuit Court for City of Roanoke. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/8/22. (slt)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (slt) |
| Filing 3 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, identifying Corporate Parent WalMart Inc. (slt) |
| Filing 2 Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., identifying Corporate Parent WalMart Inc. (slt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, case number CL22-1091. (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402; Receipt number AVAWDC-3981510), filed by Glenda N. Jaswal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Complaint and Responsive Pleading, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
