Cotman v. Streeval
| Jamaal Antonio Cotman |
| J.C. Streeval |
| 7:2022cv00451 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay Case, and this matter is STAYED pending the Supreme Court's decision in Jones v. Hendrix, No. 21-857. It is further ORDERED that the respondent shall file a response to the petition not later than 30 days after the Supreme Court issues its decision. The petitioner shall then have 30 days in which to file any reply. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 9/22/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Stay pending Supreme Court's Decision in Jones v. Hendrix by J.C. Streeval. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (Jones, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Jones on behalf of J.C. Streeval (Jones, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 8
Order of Service pursuant to Section 28 U.S.C. 2241 upon respondents re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jamaal Antonio Cotman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/31/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing Fee Received as to Jaamal Cotman: $ 5, receipt number 1-4731 (am)
|
|
Filing 7
Consent to Fee by Petitioner Jamaal Antonio Cotman (tvt)
|
|
Filing 6
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC 2241; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Consent to Fee OR Pay the $5.00 Filing Fee; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/8/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 5
Clerk's Office Response re #4 Letter/Request . (aab)
|
|
Filing 4
Letter regarding sending in filing fee by Jamaal Antonio Cotman. (Attachments: #1 Request for Withdrawal)(aab)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/5/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jamaal Antonio Cotman. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Jamaal Antonio Cotman. (Attachments: #1 EDVA Order-3:10CR185)(aab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cotman v. Streeval | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jamaal Antonio Cotman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: J.C. Streeval | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
