Claybrooks v. Valentine et al
| Graylin E. Claybrooks |
| Sheriff Lane A. Perry, Officer Valentine, Officer Clark, Sgt. Stokes, Officer Fitzgerald, Sgt. Valentine, Deputy C/O Ashley Clark, Deputy Fitzgerald and Deputy Clark |
| 7:2022cv00562 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MOTION in Limine to Produce Evidence by Graylin E. Claybrooks. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (slt) |
| Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable: re #11 Request for Waiver of Service, regarding Sgt. Stokes; (No forwarding address given) (tvt) |
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's Letter re #8 Order to Respond - Prisoner filed by Graylin E. Claybrooks. (slt) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Sgt. Valentine, et al on 11/7/2022. (Service paperwork mailed to Defendant(s) at Henry County Adult Detention Center 800 Dupont Road Martinsville, Virginia 24112) Waiver of Service due by 12/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Deputy C/O Ashley Clark, #2 Sgt. Stokes, #3 Deputy Fitzgerald, #4 Deputy Clark)(aab) |
Filing 10
Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants Clark, Ashley Clark, Fitzgerald, Stokes, Valentine re #9 Amended Complaint filed by Graylin E. Claybrooks. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/7/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party and Order/Consent to Fee mailed to Trust Officer via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clark, Ashley Clark, Fitzgerald, Stokes, Valentine, filed by Graylin E. Claybrooks.(slt) |
|
Filing 8
Order for Plaintiff to Respond with an Amended Complaint within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 10/27/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 7 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Graylin E. Claybrooks (tvt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Graylin E. Claybrooks. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) |
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 10/13/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Graylin E. Claybrooks. (slt) |
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account for the Remaining Days of June; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 9/30/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by Graylin E. Claybrooks (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(slt) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/30/2022) (slt). Modified on 9/30/2022-replaced document with correct statements and marked incomplete (slt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Clark, Clark, Fitzgerald, Lane A. Perry, Stokes, Valentine, filed by Graylin E. Claybrooks.(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
