Bristol v. Anderson et al
| Telly Savalas Bristol |
| David Anderson, Dr. Olinger, Dr. Haynes, Bateman, Abner and Spangler |
| 7:2022cv00603 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Clerks Notice of Service (OAG 1983) sent to David Anderson, et al on 12/16/2022. Pursuant to the agreement of electronic service. Waiver of Service due by 1/17/2023.(slt)
|
|
Filing 14
Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants Abner, David Anderson, Bateman, Dr. Haynes, Dr. Olinger, Spangler re #1 Complaint filed by Telly Savalas Bristol. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 12/16/2022. ( Order/Consent to Fee mailed to Trust Officer via US Mail.) Modified to include Order and Consent to fee mailed to Trust Account Officer.)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Change of Address by Telly Savalas Bristol and requesting if documents received. New address: Pocahontas State Correctional Center, PO Box 518, Pocahontas, VA 24635. (Clerk sending docket sheet.) (slt)
|
|
Filing 12
Letter to inform of who plaintiff wants summoned by Telly Savalas Bristol. (Attachments: #1 List of named individuals to be Summoned)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 11
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Telly Savalas Bristol (tvt)
|
|
Filing 10
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Responses due by 11/28/2022. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/3/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Telly Savalas Bristol. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (slt)
|
|
Filing 8
Prisoner Trust Account Report by Telly Savalas Bristol (slt)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Telly Savalas Bristol. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(slt)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/25/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account for the months of AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/21/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Telly Savalas Bristol. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Telly Savalas Bristol. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by Telly Savalas Bristol (tvt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Abner, David Anderson, Bateman, Dr. Haynes, Dr. Olinger, Spangler, filed by Telly Savalas Bristol. (Attachments: #1 Attachments- Some documents not legible in person)(tvt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
