Graham v. Trinity Food Service et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Wade Graham
Defendant: Trinity Food Service and Roanoke City Jail Kitchen
Case Number: 7:2023cv00062
Filed: January 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert S Ballou
Referring Judge: Thomas T Cullen
2 Judge: Pamela Meade Sargent
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORAL Order: Referring Case to US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent as the referral judge. Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer referral judge. Entered by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 3/8/2023. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with an Amended Complaint within 21 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 3/6/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Joseph Wade Graham (slt)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 2/22/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
February 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Joseph Wade Graham (slt)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 20 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 1/26/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Joseph Wade Graham (slt)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Roanoke City Jail Kitchen, Trinity Food Service, filed by Joseph Wade Graham.(slt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Graham v. Trinity Food Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Wade Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trinity Food Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roanoke City Jail Kitchen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?