Tattrie v. CEI-Roanoke, LLC
Plaintiff: Amber Marie Tattrie
Defendant: CEI-Roanoke, LLC doing business as Voyant Beauty
Case Number: 7:2023cv00079
Filed: February 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Michael F Urbanski
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Reply re #4 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by CEI-Roanoke, LLC. (Holden, Kevin)
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #4 MOTION to Dismiss : (CR) (No Interpreter requested) (#Click on this link for guidance for participation via Zoom and #Click on this link for instructions on how to listen to public hearings)( Motion Hearing set for 4/18/2023 09:00 AM in via Zoom before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski.), NOTICE of Hearing: (CR) (No Interpreter requested) (#Click on this link for guidance for participation via Zoom and #Click on this link for instructions on how to listen to public hearings)( Scheduling Conference set for 4/18/2023 09:00 AM in via Zoom before Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski.) (mka)
March 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #5 Brief / Memorandum in Support, #4 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Amber Marie Tattrie. (Collins, Christopher)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Scheduling Letter (mka)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by CEI-Roanoke, LLC. (Holden, Kevin)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by CEI-Roanoke, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Holden, Kevin)
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to CEI-Roanoke, LLC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(sln)
February 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons for Defendant CEI-Roanoke, LLC by Amber Marie Tattrie (Collins, Christopher) Replaced deficient pdf document with flattened pdf documentModified on 2/8/2023 (sln). (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/8/2023) (sln).
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CEI-Roanoke, LLC (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402 receipt number AVAWDC-4123334.), filed by Amber Marie Tattrie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(sln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tattrie v. CEI-Roanoke, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Marie Tattrie
Represented By: Christopher Earl Collins
Represented By: Mia Yugo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CEI-Roanoke, LLC doing business as Voyant Beauty
Represented By: Kevin Daniel Holden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?