Stricklin v. Young et al
| Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr. |
| Superintendant Young, Captain Powell, Captain Lloyd and Captain Brown |
| 7:2023cv00085 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. (Notice mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany Elizabeth Shipley on behalf of Brown, Lloyd, Powell, Young (Shipley, Brittany)
|
|
Filing 12
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Lloyd, Powell, Young, Brown. Lloyd waiver sent on 2/24/2023, answer due 4/25/2023; Powell waiver sent on 2/24/2023, answer due 4/25/2023; Young waiver sent on 2/24/2023, answer due 4/25/2023; Brown waiver sent on 2/24/2023, answer due 4/25/2023.(Fessier, Rosalie)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Rosalie Pemberton Fessier on behalf of Brown, Lloyd, Powell, Young (Fessier, Rosalie)
|
|
Filing 10
ORAL Order: Referring Case to US Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe as the referral judge. Judge Robert S. Ballou no longer referral judge. Entered by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 3/8/2023. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 9
Prisoner Trust Account Report by Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr (aab)
|
|
Filing 8
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Superintendant Young, et al on 2/24/2023. (Service paperwork mailed to Defendant(s) at Middle River Regional Jail 350 Technology Drive Staunton, Virginia 24401) Waiver of Service due by 3/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Captain Powell, #2 Captain Lloyd, #3 Captain Brown)(aab)
|
|
Filing 7
Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants All Defendants re #1 Complaint filed by Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 2/24/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party and Order/Consent to Fee mailed to Trust Officer via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr (tvt)
|
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 2/14/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Account Report by Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr (slt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou on 2/8/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 2
Statement of Assets by Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr (aab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Brown, Lloyd, Powell, Young, filed by Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr.(aab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
