Doyle v. Draper et al
| David Blane Doyle |
| Sheriff Steve Draper, 1st Lt. Law, Capt. Davis, Sgt. Duncan, Corrections Officer Horsley, Corrections Officer Martin, Lt. Accord, Officer Creasey, Officer Rattcliff, Medic Mills, Officer Moore, Officer Lee, Officer Kallam and Officer Clark |
| 7:2023cv00172 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/11/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/11/2023. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
10 Order on Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion, mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail (aab)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 4/20/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER denying #6 Prisoner Miscellaneous Motion because the court knows of no authority to order the defendants to provide office supplies to the plaintiff.. Entered by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 4/20/23. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order to be mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(PMS)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Change of Address by David Blane Doyle. Danville City Jail, P.O. Box 3304, Danville, VA 24543. (slt)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David Blane Doyle. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (slt)
|
|
Filing 7
Additional Claims re #1 Complaint by David Blane Doyle (slt)
|
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 5/8/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 4/4/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 6
Motion to be provided supplies by David Blane Doyle. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (slt)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Account Report (January and February) by David Blane Doyle (Attachments: #1 Resident Transaction Details / Statements)(slt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account for the Months of January and February; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 4/25/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 3/23/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by David Blane Doyle (aab)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Accord, Clark, Creasey, Davis, Steve Draper, Duncan, Horsley, Kallam, Law, Lee, Martin, Mills, Moore, Rattcliff, filed by David Blane Doyle.(aab)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
