Keen v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority
Joshua A. Keen |
Unknown and Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority |
7:2023cv00196 |
April 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER: Keen's petition is summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because he has not yet exhausted his available state court remedies. Further Keen's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to Strike this matter from the active docket of this court. Further finding that there has been no showing that reasonable jurists would disagree with the procedural decision, as required by 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Ballou on 4/12/2023. (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) Modified on 4/21/2023, added "Without" prejudice (aab). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua A. Keen. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (slt) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Joshua A. Keen.(slt) Modified on 4/5/2023-documents scanned as received; some appear to have left side missing. (slt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.