Doe v. Kuhn et al
| John Doe |
| Karl Kuhn and Robert Lineburg |
| 7:2023cv00209 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Scheduling Letter (mka)
|
|
Filing 7
Brief / Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTED . filed by Karl Kuhn. (Guynn, Jim)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss CORRECTED by Karl Kuhn. (Guynn, Jim)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by John Doe (Dean, Robert)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss by Karl Kuhn. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Guynn, Jim)
|
|
Filing 3
Electronic Summons Issued as to Karl Kuhn, Robert Lineburg NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Electronic Summons Issued as to Robert Lineburg)(sln)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION Proceed Under A Pseudonym by John Doe. (sln)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Karl Kuhn, Robert Lineburg (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402 receipt number AVAWDC-4165451.), filed by John Doe.(sln) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/13/2023: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sln).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
