Houchin v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
Nace Eugene Houchin, Jr. |
Commonwealth of Virginia, Attorney General, James City County Court, Virginia General Assembly, Dept. of the Army, College of William & Mary, Common Law Foreign Power Policy, Commonwealth All Co-Conspirators and Virginia State B.A.R. |
7:2023cv00244 |
May 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
James P Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 DETAILS: Case transferred from Virginia Western has been opened in Eastern District of Virginia - as case 2:23-cv-00244, filed 05/04/2023.(slt) |
Filing 3 Order transferring case to Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 5/3/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Nace Eugene Houchin, Jr (slt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Attorney General, College of William & Mary, Common Law Foreign Power Policy, Commonwealth All Co-Conspirators, Commonwealth of Virginia, Dept. of the Army, James City County Court, Virginia General Assembly, Virginia State B.A.R., filed by Nace Eugene Houchin, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (Documents scanned as received.)(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.