White v. Flagship Facility Services, Inc.
| Kristen A. White |
| Flagship Facility Services, Inc. |
| 7:2023cv00267 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kristen A. White (Byrd, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 8
First Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #7 Brief/Memorandum . filed by Kristen A. White. (Byrd, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 7
Brief/Memorandum of Law in Support of Demurrer / 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss. filed by Flagship Facility Services, Inc.. (Liller, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
Certified True Paper Copies of State Court Record(s) received from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number(s) CL23000187-00 consisting of Complaint (page 2), Demurrer (page 8). (Records available for viewing in the clerks office.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sln) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2023: #2 Envelope) (sln). Modified to include envelope on 5/17/2023 (sln).
|
|
Filing 5
Order Requesting Transmittal of Case File from Pulaski County Circuit Court. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 05/12/2023. (sln)
|
|
Filing 4
Positive Corporate Disclosure Statement by Flagship Facility Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Flagship Enterprises Holding, Inc. for Flagship Facility Services, Inc.. (Liller, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Consent Notice to Parties. #Click here to access the Consent Form (sln)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Filing Requirement to Flagship Facility Services, Inc. - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (sln)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number CL23000187-00. (Filing & Administrative fee $402, receipt number AVAWDC-4184882), filed by Flagship Facility Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Demurrer, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sln)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: White v. Flagship Facility Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kristen A. White | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin DeKalb Byrd |
| Represented By: | Devon J. Munro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Flagship Facility Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Lawrence Liller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
