Doe v. Radford University et al
John Doe |
Radford University and Dr. Andrea Zuschin, Title IX |
7:2023cv00274 |
May 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Robert S Ballou |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Andrea Zuschin, Title IX. Andrea Zuschin, Title IX waiver sent on 5/23/2023, answer due 7/24/2023.(Kelly, Sheri) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Radford University. Radford University waiver sent on 5/23/2023, answer due 7/24/2023.(Kelly, Sheri) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sheri Hiter Kelly on behalf of Radford University, Andrea Zuschin, Title IX (Kelly, Sheri) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Radford University, Andrea Zuschin, Title IX NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Electronic Summons Issued as to Dr. Andrea Auschin, Title IX)(sln) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WITH SUPPORTING AUTHORITY against Radford University, DR. Andrea Zuschin, Title IX (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402 receipt number AVAWDC-4187084.), filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(sln) Modified docket text title on 5/16/2023 (sln). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.