Arrington v. Clarke
| Javon Lamont Arrington |
| Unknown and Harold W. Clarke |
| 7:2023cv00275 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice; all pending motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot; and the Clerk shall STRIKE the action from the court's active docket. Additionally because Arrington has not made the requisite showing, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/22/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Javon Lamont Arrington (aab) |
| Filing 8 Consent to Fee by Petitioner Javon Lamont Arrington (aab) |
| Filing 7 Response re #6 Order Prisoner Conditionally Filed, filed by Javon Lamont Arrington. (aab) |
|
Filing 6
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Consent to Fee or Pay the $5.00 Filing Fee; Petitioner is hereby DIRECTED to submit to the court within thirty (30) days from then entry of this Order his declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, stating either (1) that he objects to the court's intention to address his submission as a 2254 petition, or (2) stating that he does not object to the court addressing his post-conviction motion as his first habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254, in which case he SHALL complete the ENCLOSED 2254 form. Petitioner is hereby DIRECTED to submit within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order any argument or evidence he desires to present concerning the timeliness of his petition under 2244(d); Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 5/18/2023. (Order and 2254 form mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-00203. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 4 TRANSFER ORDER. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned case shall be, and hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Transfer Order to Petitioner and to effectuate the transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 5/15/2023. Copies mailed 5/16/2023.(jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/16/2023.] |
| Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/16/2023.] |
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/16/2023.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Javon Lamont Arrington. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/16/2023.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION, Conditionally filed for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Javon Lamont Arrington.(jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 5/16/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
