Proffitt v. Wellpath et al
| Richard M. Proffitt |
| WVRJ, Wellpath, Correct Care LLC, Western Virginia Regional Jail, Superintendent David Cox, Major Chad Keller, Captain Hiner, Lt. Craig Childers, Med Dir Bruce St. Amour, Doctor Kimala McDaniels and Unnamed Medical Staff |
| 7:2023cv00276 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Wellpath, Western Virginia Regional Jail, David Cox, Chad Keller, Hiner, Craig Childers, Bruce St. Amour, Kimala McDaniels, Unnamed Medical Staff, filed by Richard M. Proffitt.(aab) (Scanned in the order it was received)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Motion to Amend/Correct. The plaintiff shall file and Amended Complaint listing all claims against all defendants he wishes to pursue by no later than 7/14/23.. Entered by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 6/14/23. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order to be mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(PMS)
|
|
11 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail (aab)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Richard M. Proffitt. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(aab)
|
|
Filing 9
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Richard M. Proffitt (aab)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 5/30/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER dismissing all claims against Western Virginia Regional jail pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and the Clerk shall TERMINATE the Western Virginia Regional Jail as a defendant. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty (30) days in which to amend his complaint against Wellpath, if he so advised. Failure to file an amended complaint with the court within thirty (30) days shall result in dismiss of this action without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Ballou on 5/29/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Ballou on 5/29/2023. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 5
Proposed Order for a Temporary Restraining Order with the first page of a civil rights complaint form filed by Richard M. Proffitt (tvt)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Richard M. Proffitt. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 6/20/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 5/16/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 2
Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Richard M. Proffitt (Attachments: #1 Statement of Assets)(slt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against WVRJ, Wellpath, filed by Richard M. Proffitt.(slt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
