Grover Gaming, Inc. v. Huffman
Grover Gaming, Inc. |
Rodger Huffman |
7:2023cv00321 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Thomas T Cullen |
Michael F Urbanski |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Brief / Memorandum in Opposition re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Grover Gaming, Inc.. (Drewry, Robert) |
Filing 13 ORAL ORDER: On July 17, 2023, Defendant Roger Huffman filed a notice (ECF No. #12 ) indicating that a related case, Grover Gaming, Inc. v. William J. Rice, 5:23-cv-00036-MFU (W.D. Va. June 13, 2023), is present on the Honorable Chief United States District Judge Michael F. Urbanski's docket. Given the Defendant's representations in his notice, the court has compared the two cases and determined that they are substantially similar to one another. The same plaintiff asserts the same claims against two defendants who allegedly work for the same company. To avoid inconsistent results, therefore, this matter is TRANSFERRED to Chief Judge Urbanski for further proceedings. Entered by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 7/18/2023. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.(ck) |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Rodger Huffman of Related Action (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Finney, Michael) |
Filing 11 Brief / Memorandum in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Rodger Huffman. (Finney, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Rodger Huffman. (Finney, Michael) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by William Longstreet Spotswood on behalf of Rodger Huffman (Spotswood, William) |
Filing 8 ORAL ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond. Rodger Huffman answer due 7/17/2023. Entered by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 6/29/2023. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.(ck) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond by Rodger Huffman. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Finney, Michael) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Grover Gaming, Inc.. Rodger Huffman served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/3/2023.(Drewry, Robert) |
Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Rodger Huffman NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Please print copies of the electronically issued summons for each defendant as necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.(slt) |
Filing 4 Negative Corporate Disclosure Statement by Grover Gaming, Inc. (Faraci, Stephen) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Rodger Huffman by Grover Gaming, Inc. (Faraci, Stephen) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Requirement - Pursuant to Standing Order dated May 15, 2000, and the adoption of Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, effective December 1, 2002, nongovernmental corporate parties are directed to file a Corporate Disclosure Statement with their first appearance, pleading, motion or response. #Click here to access the Corporate Disclosure Statement Form. This form should be electronically filed in this matter as ordered. (slt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rodger Huffman (Filing & Administrative fee $ 402 receipt number AVAWDC-4196670.), filed by Grover Gaming, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.