Sabbats v. White et al
| Rachel Hallows Sabbats and Ronald Lynn Duncan |
| Warden White, Mr. Creech, Duncan, The Unit Manager, Harold Clark, The Attorney General, The Governor of Virginia and Officers |
| 7:2023cv00326 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| James P Jones |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Letter regarding if court received consent to fee by Rachel Hallows Sabbats. (Address on envelope has a name of someone other than the pro se plaintiff. Clerk sending docket sheet. Requestor will receive a copy of any order when the Court issues it. ) (aab) Modified on 7/26/2023, added information regarding address on envelope. (aab).
|
|
Filing 12
Clerks Notice of Service (OAG 1983) sent to White, et al on 7/21/2023 by Rachel Hallows Sabbats. Pursuant to the agreement of electronic service. Waiver of Service due by 8/21/2023.(tvt)
|
|
Filing 11
Order entered Directing the Clerk to attempt service of process upon the named defendants White, Unit Manager of the ROSP Protective Custody Unit, PREA Coordinator Duncan, Senior Psychologist Mr. Creech, and Harold Clarke re #1 Complaint; the defendants are DIRECTED to respond to plaintiff's motions for interlocutory injunctive relief #2 and #8 within 21 days after receipt of service, Granting In Forma Pauperis. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 7/21/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 10
Response re #9 Letter/Request. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 9
Letter inquiring if the court received consent to fee by Rachel Hallows Sabbats. (tvt)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Rachel Hallows Sabbats. (Attachments: #1 Declaration from Angelica Matthews, #2 Envelope)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 7
Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Rachel Hallows Sabbats (aab)
|
|
Filing 6
Additional Evidence - Grievances "Exhaustion of Remedy" by Rachel Hallows Sabbats (aab)
|
|
Filing 5
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 7/24/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 6/20/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Rachel Hallows Sabbats (aab)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 7/10/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 6/5/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Rachel Hallows Sabbats. (Attachments: #1 Birth Certificate, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(slt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Harold Clark, Creech, Duncan, Officers, The Attorney General, The Governor of Virginia, The Unit Manager, White, filed by Rachel Hallows Sabbats. (Attachments: #1 Attachment E, #2 Attachment D)(slt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
