Hinton v. Warden
| Gary A. Hinton |
| Unknown and Warden |
| 7:2023cv00370 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Order for Petitioner to respond within 30 days as to the requirements set forth in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 8/4/2023. (Order and all other items as directed in the Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing Fee Received from Gary Hilton: $ 5.00, receipt number 7-76785. Receipt mailed to Gary Hilton. (slt) |
|
Filing 2
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC 2254; Regarding Completing and Submitting the Enclosed 2254 form; Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Consent to Fee or Pay the $5.00 Filing Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 6/26/2023. (Order and 2254 form mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Gary A. Hinton.(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
