Crumpton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
William D. Crumpton |
Commonwealth of Virginia, Harold Clarke, White, H. Swann, D. Taylor and Copeland |
7:2023cv00571 |
September 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Michael F Urbanski |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/19/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is hereby directed to pay the Clerk within 30 days from entry of this Order the total $402.00 in filing costs. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 9/7/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by William D. Crumpton (aab) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William D. Crumpton. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (aab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Harold Clarke, Commonwealth of Virginia, Copeland, H. Swann, D. Taylor, White, filed by William D. Crumpton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Affidavit, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Cover Letter)(aab) (First page of the 1983 complaint form was not included) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.