Vyas v. Hutcheson et al
Tarun Kumar Vyas |
Sheriff Bryan Hutcheson, Captain Jimmy Wimer, Lieutenant, All Jail Staff Members, County of Rockingham, City Of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County Sheriff's Office (RCSO) |
7:2023cv00582 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
Joel C Hoppe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
14 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Document, mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail (aab) |
Filing 14 ORAL ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document. Within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, as directed in the Order entered on October 12, 2023, ECF No. 12. Entered by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 11/3/23. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(JCH) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Tarun Kumar Vyas. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (tvt) |
Filing 12 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with an Amended Complaint within 30 days; DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE #10 MOTION to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 10/12/2023. (Order and blank complaint form mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt) |
Filing 11 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Tarun Kumar Vyas (aab) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, by Tarun Kumar Vyas. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) |
Filing 9 Letter/Request regarding if documents were received by Tarun Kumar Vyas. ( Clerk sending docket sheet. Requestor will receive a copy of any order when the Court issues it. ) (aab) |
Filing 8 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 9/19/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 7 Letter by Tarun Kumar Vyas. (slt) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Tarun Kumar Vyas (slt) |
Filing 5 Letter/Request if complaint was received by Tarun Kumar Vyas. ( Clerk sending docket sheet and 1983 form. ) (aab) |
Filing 4 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 9/11/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 3 Statement of Assets by Tarun Kumar Vyas (aab) |
Filing 2 Motion to Subpoena the Kiosk Messages by Tarun Kumar Vyas. Motions referred to Judge Joel C. Hoppe. (aab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Jail Staff Members, City Of Harrisonburg, County of Rockingham, Bryan Hutcheson, Lieutenant(Responded to the first grievance, could be Wilberger or Madison), Lieutenant(Failed to respond to second grievance, could be Wilberger or Madison), Rockingham County Sheriff's Office (RCSO), Jimmy Wimer, filed by Tarun Kumar Vyas. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.