Molina v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center
| Walter Antonio Gomez Molina and Walter Antonio Gomez |
| Keen Mountain Correctional Center |
| 7:2023cv00737 |
| November 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| C Kailani Memmer |
| Michael F Urbanski |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter asking if Consent to Fee was Received by Walter Antonio Gomez Molina. ( Clerk sending docket sheet. Requestor will receive a copy of any order when the Court issues it. ) (aab) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Walter Antonio Gomez Molina (aab) |
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 11/13/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Walter Antonio Gomez Molina (tvt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Keen Mountain Correctional Center, filed by Walter Antonio Gomez Molina.(tvt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
