Woodson v. Dye et al
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr. |
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener, Mr. Hawks, Mr. Hunt and Mr. Looney |
7:2023cv00817 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Thomas T Cullen |
Joel C Hoppe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 1/31/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Thomas T. Cullen on 1/31/2024. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 12/18/2023. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 2 Statement of Assets by Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr (aab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against T. Dye, Hawks, Hunt, Looney, Sater, Widener, filed by Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Violation of Inmate Constitutional Rights)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.