Wilborn v. Wang et al
Kenneth Dean Wilborn |
Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang, Dr. Ohia and Dr. Mark Amonette |
7:2024cv00006 |
January 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
C Kailani Memmer |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Kenneth Dean Wilborn (aab) |
|
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-00677. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 1/2/2024.] |
Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 1/2/2024.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Dean Wilborn. (jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 1/2/2024.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Dr. Mark Amonette, Dr. Ohia, Dr. Lawrence Shu Chang Wang (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Kenneth Dean Wilborn. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(jmey, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 1/2/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.