Blackwell v. Southwest VA Regional Jail Authority et al
| Matthew Don Blackwell |
| Southwest VA Regional Jail Authority, Coumberland Mnt Community Services, Male Magestrate Tazewell Co. VA and Tazewell Conty VA Sheriffs Dep |
| 7:2024cv00049 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Petition for a 911 Call filed by Matthew Don Blackwell (aab) |
Filing 15
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 4/17/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 3/15/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 14 Prisoner Trust Account Report by Matthew Don Blackwell (tvt) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Matthew Don Blackwell.(aab) |
| Filing 12 Letter regarding health conditions, and the judicial system being unjust and unlawful, as well as information about obtaining prisoner trust report information by Matthew Don Blackwell. (tvt) |
| Filing 11 Response re #10 Letter (unsigned) requesting the Court to send the trust officer the prisoner trust account report directly. (tvt) |
| Filing 10 Letter (unsigned) requesting the Court to send the trust officer the prisoner trust account report directly by Matthew Don Blackwell. (tvt) |
| Filing 9 Request Medical Records be sent to the Court by Matthew Don Blackwell. (tvt) |
|
Filing 8
Order for Plaintiff to Respond with the prisoner trust account report within 30 days. Responses due by 4/1/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 2/27/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 7 Additional Evidence - Page 11 (Signature page of complaint) re #3 Copy of Compliant by Matthew Don Blackwell (aab) |
| Filing 6 Response re #2 Order Prisoner Conditionally Filed,, filed by Matthew Don Blackwell. (aab) |
| Filing 5 Additional Evidence by Matthew Don Blackwell (aab) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and Statement of Assets by Matthew Don Blackwell (aab) |
| Filing 3 Copy of Compliant ( Not signed and missing page 11) filed by Matthew Don Blackwell (aab) |
|
Filing 2
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Signed Complaint; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 2/20/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 1/16/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Coumberland Mnt Community Services, Male Magestrate Tazewell Co. VA, Southwest VA Regional Jail Authority, Tazewell Conty VA Sheriffs Dep, filed by Matthew Don Blackwell. (Complaint missing page 11, signature page) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter regarding right to practice religion)(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
