Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
| Patrick Jacques |
| Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton, C. Barnette, J. Edwards, C. Choate and Lieutenant Hamilton |
| 7:2024cv00095 |
| February 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Ballou on 3/20/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Ballou on 3/20/2024. (Opinion mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
|
Filing 7
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 28 USC 1331 Bivens Act; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 3/11/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 2/5/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 6
Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-20375. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case and take all necessary steps to ensure the prompt transfer of the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/5/2024. See attached document for full details. (wce) [Transferred from Florida Southern on 2/5/2024.]
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/1/2024. (jgr) [Transferred from Florida Southern on 2/5/2024.]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses).Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/1/2024. (jgr) [Transferred from Florida Southern on 2/5/2024.]
|
|
Filing 2
Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal (kma) [Transferred from Florida Southern on 2/5/2024.]
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint pursuant to Bivens against C. Barnette, Captain Bowles, C. Choate, Counselor Calton, J. Edwards, Lieutenant Hamilton, S. Scott. Filing fee $ 405.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Patrick Jacques.(kma) [Transferred from Florida Southern on 2/5/2024.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
