Brown v. Culpeper County Jail et al
| David F. Brown |
| Culpeper County Jail, Culpeper County Circuit Court and Dr. Micheal Cowen |
| 7:2024cv00158 |
| March 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Elizabeth K Dillon |
| C Kailani Memmer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 4/29/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 16 Prisoner Trust Account Report by David F. Brown (aab) |
|
Filing 15
Order for Plaintiff to Respond with the Prisoner Trust Account Report within 30 days. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 4/10/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff's second motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 12, is DENIED without prejudice for the reasons stated in the courts previous order denying his first motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 7. Entered by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 4/1/2024. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt) |
| Filing 13 Letter calling "names from the claim shall come forward" by David F. Brown. (NOTE: This document only had #2 up in left hand corner. There was no page #1) (tvt) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David F. Brown. Motions referred to Judge C. Kailani Memmer. (tvt) |
| Filing 11 Additional Evidence by David F. Brown (tvt) |
| Filing 10 Statement of Assets by David F. Brown (tvt) |
| Filing 9 Incomplete Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by David F. Brown (tvt) |
| Filing 8 Request for change of jurisdiction and inmate account information not honored by David F. Brown. (tvt) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 3/12/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 6 Letter requesting court date by David F. Brown. (aab) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David F. Brown. Motions referred to Judge C. Kailani Memmer. (aab) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 3/4/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 3
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 3/4/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(aab)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David F. Brown. Motions referred to Judge C. Kailani Memmer. (aab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Micheal Cowen, Culpeper County Circuit Court, Culpeper County Jail, filed by David F. Brown.(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
