Chavis v. Holbrook et al
| Jaeon Chavis |
| Lea Holbrook, Dr. Happy Smith, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority, Dr. Fox, D. Trent, R.N. Meade and Jane and John Does |
| 7:2024cv00243 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Thomas T Cullen |
| Joel C Hoppe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joel C. Hoppe on 4/10/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Jane and John Doe's, Dr. Fox, Lea Holbrook, R.N. Meade, Red Onion State Prison Medical Authority, Happy Smith, D. Trent, filed by Jaeon Chavis. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit 1-15, #3 Exhibit 17-23, #4 Exhibit 24-29, #5 Exhibit 30-49)(Scanned as received, some documents not very legible) (tvt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
