Paxton v. Naphcare Medical Department et al
Jonardo Paxton |
Naphcare Medical Department and Haley F.N.P. |
7:2024cv00392 |
June 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
C Kailani Memmer |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Response re #5 Order to Respond regarding addresses for defendants filed by Jonardo Paxton. (tvt) |
Filing 5 Order for Plaintiff to Respond with an address or addresses at which service may be accomplished on defendants within 30 days. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 7/2/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(tvt) |
Filing 4 Consent to Fee by Plaintiff Jonardo Paxton (tvt) |
Filing 3 Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Consent to Fee; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Signed by Honorable C. Kailani Memmer on 6/18/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(aab) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report and Statement of Assets by Jonardo Paxton (aab) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Haley F.N.P., Naphcare Medical Department, filed by Jonardo Paxton.(aab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.