Lassiter v. Harris et al
| Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. |
| Sgt. Blevins, Sgt. Brat, Floor Officers /, Correctional Officer Muncy, Sgt. Bogg, Correctional Officer A. Harris, Correctional Officer Davis and Pill Call Nurse |
| 7:2024cv00701 |
| October 11, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
| Robert S Ballou |
| Pamela Meade Sargent |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
9 Minute Order, mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail. (jv)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Plaintiff's Response to court order at #6 due by 12/18/2024. Entered by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 11/20/24. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to any applicable pro se party/parties via US Mail)(PMS)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 Order Prisoner Conditionally Filed,, by Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. Motions referred to Judge Pamela Meade Sargent. (mlp)
|
|
Filing 7
Letter/Request for Case Status, by Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. ( Clerk sending docket sheet. Requestor will receive a copy of any order when the Court issues it. ) (aab)
|
|
Filing 6
Order entered Conditionally Filing this action pursuant to 42 USC 1983; Regarding Prisoner Trust Account; Statement of Assets; Advising inmate as to 3 strikes rule of PLRA; Assessing a filing fee; Deferring all action in this case; Advising inmate to comply within the allotted time and to notify of changes in address or risk dismissal within 30 days. Responses due by 11/18/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/15/2024. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party/Parties via US Mail)(aab)
|
|
Filing 5
Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 2:24-cv-00602. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 4
TRANSFER ORDER. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned case shall be, and hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Transfer Order to Plaintiff and to effectuate the transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 10/11/2024. Copies mailed 10/11/2024. (jmey) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 10/15/2024.]
|
|
Case transferred to District of Western District of Virginia. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (jmey) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 10/15/2024.]
|
|
Filing 3
Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 10/15/2024.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. (jmey) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 10/15/2024.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Sgt. Blevins, Sgt. Bogg, Sgt. Brat, Davis, Floor Officers 8/27/2024 / 9/13/2024, A. Harris, Muncy, Pill Call Nurse 8/27/2024, Pill Call Nurse 9/11/2024, Pill Call Nurse 9/13/2024 (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope) (jmey) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 10/15/2024.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
