Quinlan v. County of King et al
Terrance Joe Quinlan |
County of King, King County Sheriff Office, Keith Martin, Alvarez and Keller |
4:2022cv05152 |
November 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Thomas O Rice |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING TRANSFER TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. All future documents pertaining to this action should be submitted to that District. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LTR, Case Administrator) **3 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL** (Terrance Quinlan, Prisoner ID: 787918) |
Remark - Case transferred from Washington Eastern has been opened in Washington Western as case number 2:22-cv-01718, filed 12/2/2022. **TEXT ONLY ENTRY, PRINT NEF ONLY** (Terrance Quinlan, Prisoner ID: 787918) (CLP, Case Administrator Team Lead) |
Filing 4 Letter from Clerk - Advising prisoner of case number. (LTR, Case Administrator) **PRINT ALL** (Terrance Quinlan, Prisoner ID: 787918) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alvarez, County of King, Keller, King County Sheriff Office, Keith Martin (Filing Fee $402, Receipt # IFP Pending) Jury Demand. Filed by Terrance Joe Quinlan. (Note: 2 page Exhibit A attached to complaint -- PLRA statement and cover sheet -- filed separately.)(LTR, Case Administrator) **40 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Terrance Quinlan, Prisoner ID: 787918) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.