Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CALIX v. AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
as 1:2026cv00949
Plaintiff:
FELIX ALVAREZ CALIX
Defendant:
AMERICAN MODERN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Alvarez v. The City of New York
as 26-2576
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALVAREZ
Defendant:
ALEXIS SOTO, Police Officer, Shield Number 13519, in her individual and official capacity, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRONX COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02583
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Wilson v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2026cv07456
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Rene Alvarez, K. Ttienken, A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01628
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarez v. Conopco, Inc.
as 2:2026cv10397
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gomez Alvarez
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
