Plaintiff Avvo, Inc. seeks damages and attorneys' fees and costs for alleged breach of contract, bad faith, violation of the Consumer Protection Act and violation of the Insurance Fair Conduct Act, in connection with Defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company's response to a claim under an insurance policy Defendant issued to Plaintiff. The claim relates to Browne v. Avvo.
|Plaintiff:||Avvo Inc and Mark Britton|
|Defendant:||Westchester Fire Insurance Company|
|Filed:||October 30, 2008|
|Court:||US District Court for the Western District of Washington|
|Presiding Judge:||Marsha J. Pechman|
|Nature of Suit:||Plaintiff|
|Cause of Action:||Diversity|
|Jury Demanded By:||28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract|
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
|Date Filed||Document Text|
|January 20, 2009||Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having notified the Court of settlement of this case, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any party. In the event that settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case within 30 days of the date of this order. Any trial date and pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED. Signedby Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD)|
|January 20, 2009||Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER - The parties have not complied with the order directing that a joint status report be filed by 1/13/09. The time for filing the report is hereby extended to ten days from the date of this order. Joint Status Report due by 1/30/2009. If the report is not filed sanctions may be ordered. Sanctions may include dismissal of the action without prejudice by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD)|
|December 2, 2008||Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT Joint Status Report due by 1/13/2009 FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/30/2008 Initial Disclosure Deadline is 1/6/2009 by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RK)|
|November 10, 2008||Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiffs Avvo Inc, Mark Britton re 7 Jury Demand. (Savitt, James)|
|November 10, 2008||Filing 7 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiffs Avvo Inc, Mark Britton. (Savitt, James)|
|November 5, 2008||Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Westchester Fire Insurance Company.(Stone, Benjamin)|
|November 3, 2008||Filing 5 AMENDMENT to Rule 7.1 Disclosure of Defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company to 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company. (Stone, Benjamin)|
|October 31, 2008||Filing 4 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re 1 Notice of Removal Declaration of Benjamin J. Stone regarding REcords and Proceedings in State Court by Defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company. (Stone, Benjamin)|
|October 30, 2008||Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRCP 7.1. by Westchester Fire Insurance Company. Filed by Defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company.(DJ)|
|October 30, 2008||Filing 2 DECLARATION OF BENJAMIN J. STONE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Defendant Westchester Fire Insurance Company. (DJ)|
|October 30, 2008||Filing 1 DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT from King County Superior Court, case number 08-2-34053-8 SEA; (Receipt #: SEA21539), filed by Westchester Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Transmittal email)(DJ)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.