Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BAKER v. BRITTON et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
RONNY BAKER
Defendant:
DET MARK BRITTON and POLICE OFFICER SCHARF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOFFITT v. BRITTON
as 3:2021cv00109
Defendant:
MARK BRITTON
Plaintiff:
JESSE S. MOFFITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. Standard Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv02387
Plaintiff:
Mark Britton
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2015cv01712
Defendant:
MARK BRITTON, WILLIAM BUECKERS, BRIAN BURNETT and others
Plaintiff:
BILLIE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nichols et al v. Community Bank and Trust of Southeast Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Rex A. Nichols , Nichols Properties, Inc. and Cambron Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Community Bank and Trust of Southeast Alabama and Mark Britton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville v. Dale Risling, et al
as 11-15104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAHTO TRIBE OF THE LAYTONVILLE RANCHERIA
Defendant:
DALE RISLING, Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior, KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior and LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, U.S. Department of the Interior
Movant - Appellant:
GENE WILLIAM SLOAN, BERT U. SLOAN, MELODY SLOAN and others
Avvo Inc et al v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv01597
Plaintiff:
Avvo Inc and Mark Britton
Defendant:
Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Westchester Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Browne et al v. Avvo Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00920
Plaintiff:
John Henry Browne, John Henry Browne, John Henry Browne and others
Defendant:
Avvo Inc, Avvo Inc, Avvo Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
