The Riverside Publishing Company v. Mercer Publishing LLC et al
| The Riverside Publishing Company |
| Rachel Hubbard, Mercer Publishing LLC and Michael Hubbard |
| Mercer Publishing LLC, Rachel Hubbard and Michael Hubbard |
| The Riverside Publishing Company |
| 2:2011cv01249 |
| July 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER - Documents Unsealed per Court order and Motions terminated: Motion Calendar to address summary judgment motion, motion to amend, discovery motion, and related motions. re 58 Stipulated MOTION to Seal Documents, 61 MOTION to Seal Test Items and Certain Other Material Designated as "Confiden. by Judge Richard A Jones. (MD)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER denying dfts' 101 Motion for TRO by Judge Richard A Jones.(RS)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Enjoin Arbitration; denying 22 Motion to Compel Arbitration, by Judge Richard A Jones. (JJ)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER by Judge Richard A. Jones denying 6 Sealed Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Motions terminated: 4 MOTION to Seal filed by The Riverside Publishing Company, 2 MOTION Motion to File Certain Redacted Documents filed by The Riverside Publishing Company. Plaintiff must file redacted version of one exhibit by August 11. (JJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
