Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mercer Publishing Inc et al v. The Riverside Publishing Company et al
as 2:2012cv02170
Plaintiff:
Mercer Publishing Inc , Michael Hubbard and Rachel Hubbard
Defendant:
The Riverside Publishing Company, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company and Dr. David S Lohman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mercer Publishing Inc et al v. TestingMom.com LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Mercer Publishing Inc, Michael Hubbard and Rachel Hubbard
Defendant:
TestingMom.com LLC, Karen Quinn and Michael McCurdy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mercer Publishing Inc et al v. Smart Cookie Ink, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Mercer Publishing Inc , Michael Hubbard and Rachel Hubbard
Defendant:
Smart Cookie Ink, LLC and Deepa Rajagopal
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
The Riverside Publishing Compa v. Mercer Publishing LLC, et al
as 11-35960
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
THE RIVERSIDE PUBLISHING COMPANY
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
MERCER PUBLISHING LLC, MICHAEL HUBBARD and RACHEL HUBBARD, husband and wife, and the marital community comprised therein
The Riverside Publishing Company v. Mercer Publishing LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01249
Defendant:
Mercer Publishing LLC , Michael Hubbard and Rachel Hubbard
Plaintiff:
The Riverside Publishing Company
Counter_claimant:
Mercer Publishing LLC , Rachel Hubbard and Michael Hubbard
Counter_defendant:
The Riverside Publishing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riverside Publishing Company v. Mercer Publishing LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Riverside Publishing Company and Riverside Publishing Company
Defendant:
Mercer Publishing LLC, Michael Hubbard and Rachel Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv07228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
