NCR Corporation v. Goh
| NCR Corporation |
| Chris Goh |
| 2:2016cv00127 |
| January 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| Marsha J. Pechman |
| Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. The facts are not in dispute and the Court finds as a matter of law that Defendant Goh is entitled to summary judgment confirming the decision of the arbitrator. The decision was issued in conformity with the requirements which the Supreme Court announced in Stolt-Nielsen and Oxford Health. The arbitrator unquestionably construed the Agreement and the result is thus entitled to be upheld. Plaintiff NCR'S 60 motion for summary judgment will be DENIED; Defendant Goh's 58 motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. The arbitrator's ruling is hereby CONFIRMED. (PM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT denying NCR's 42 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting Mr. Goh's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
