Cook Productions, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
| Cook Productions, LLC |
| Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6, Doe 7, Doe 8, Doe 9, Doe 10, Doe 11, Doe 12, Doe 13 and Doe 14 |
| 2:2016cv01884 |
| December 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER vacating defaults entered against defendants in this matter (dkts. 58 , 50 , 61 ); granting plaintiff's 87 Unopposed Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (dkt. 21 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (cc: Defendants Thomas Swanicke, Yoo Kyung Pak, Shanon Reynolds via USPS)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER granting plaintiff's 80 Motion to Resume Proceedings; directing plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE by 11/16/2018, why the Court should not vacate the defaults entered in this matter. Any objection by a defendant to plaintiff's response to this show cause order shall be filed by 12/7/2018. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT) (cc: Pro se defendants via USPS) (Main Document 82 replaced on 10/19/2018 to correct formatting. NEF regenerated.) (SWT).
|
|
Filing
78
MINUTE ORDER granting plaintiff's 74 Motion to Seal; Exhibit A to the Declaration of David Lowe, docket no. 77 , shall remain under seal until further order of the Court. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (cc: Thomas Swanicke, Shannon Reynolds, Yookyng Pak via USPS)
|
|
Filing
70
MINUTE ORDER vacating 60 Order Entering Default against Shannon Reynolds; staying discovery in this matter; directing plaintiff, if it wishes to further pursue claims against the remaining defendants, to file, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Minute Order, a declaration listing the amounts each settling defendant has paid to plaintiff. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (cc: pro se defendants via USPS)
|
|
Filing
68
MINUTE ORDER denying Defendant Thomas Swanicke's 56 Motion to Dismiss, authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly.(SWT) (cc: all pro se defendants via USPS)
|
|
Filing
62
MINUTE ORDER re Plaintiff's 57 Response to Order to Show Cause construed as Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Amended Complaint on Steve Austin ; The Court is satisfied an additional extension of time to serve is warranted and EXTENDS the deadline to effect service to 9/25/2017 ; Plaintiff's renewed motion for alternative service by mail is DENIED. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (cc: Thomas Swanicke and Yookyng Pak via USPS)
|
|
Filing
55
MINUTE ORDER denying plaintiff's 43 Second Motion for Leave to Permit Alternative Service ; plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by 7/28/2017 why its claims against defendant Steve Austin should not be dismissed without prejudice. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT) (cc: Thomas Swanicke and Yookyng Pak via USPS)
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 36 motion to permit alternative mail service on defendants Steve Austin and Tyree Smith. The motion is granted as to defendant Tyree Smith and denied as to defendant Steve Austin. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (PM) cc: to pro se parties
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER denying Defendant Doe 7's 16 Motion to Quash Subpoena. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
