Benson et al v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Randy M Benson and Marilynn Sue Benson
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 2:2018cv01244
Filed: August 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Ricardo S Martinez
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2018 Filing 16 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties (Dwyer, Nathan)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER by Chief Judge Ricardo S. Martinez re: #13 Initial Disclosures filed by Marilynn Sue Benson. The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiffs have improperly filed Rule 26 Initial Disclosures in violation of the Court's Local Rules and the Court will disregard the filing. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5(b): "Rule 26 initial disclosures and discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in the proceedings or the court orders filing." The Court reminds counsel that they are expected to be familiar with the Court's rules and practices. (CAO)
October 10, 2018 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint; Defendant's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint for Damages for Personal Injuries Attorney Natalie A. Heineman added to party Target Corporation(pty:dft) by Target Corporation.(Heineman, Natalie)
October 10, 2018 Filing 13 INITIAL DISCLOSURES Filed by Plaintiff Marilynn Sue Benson.(Dwyer, Nathan)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 10/19/2018, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 10/5/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/12/2018, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW)
September 4, 2018 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by William M. McCool. Case reassigned to Judge Ricardo S. Martinez for all further proceedings. Hon. Brian A Tsuchida no longer assigned to case. cc to RSM. (AE)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 11/5/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/12/2018, Joint Status Report due by 11/19/2018. (KMP) Stricken on 9/4/2018. Declination received via fax on 8/28/2018. (AE).
September 4, 2018 Filing 9 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Dkt. #8 , Notice of assignment, case remains assigned to Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida. (AE) Stricken on 9/4/2018. Declination received via fax on 8/28/2018. (AE).
August 24, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida, if this form is not returned by by 8/31/2018. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (AE)
August 23, 2018 Filing 7 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re: receipt of case from Skagit County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (DJ)
August 23, 2018 Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida added. (DJ)
August 22, 2018 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Target Corporation (Umlauf, Roy)
August 22, 2018 Filing 5 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant Target Corporation (Umlauf, Roy)
August 22, 2018 Filing 4 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #2 Declaration (non motion), #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Notice-Other by Defendant Target Corporation (Umlauf, Roy)
August 22, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE to Plaintiffs of Notice of Removal re #2 Declaration (non motion), #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendant Target Corporation. (Umlauf, Roy)
August 22, 2018 Filing 2 DECLARATION of Roy A. Umlauf in Support of Defendant Target's Notice of Removal of Action re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Umlauf, Roy)
August 22, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Skagit County Superior Court, case number 18-2-00825-29; (Receipt # 0981-5444589), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Umlauf, Roy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benson et al v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Roy Andrew Umlauf
Represented By: Natalie A. Heineman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy M Benson
Represented By: Nathan T Dwyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marilynn Sue Benson
Represented By: Nathan T Dwyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?