Jatta v. Clark et al
Petitioner: Alieu Jatta
Respondent: Nathalie Asher, Lowell Clark and William P Barr
Case Number: 2:2019cv02086
Filed: December 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Barbara J Rothstein
Referring Judge: Mary Alice Theiler
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Granting Temporary Stay of Removal. Petitioner's request for release is DENIED. The court temporarily STAYS Petitioner's removal and transfer from this district. The court expresses no views at this time as to the merits of petitioner's habeas petition, request for stay of removal, or request for stay of transfer. On or before February 28, 2020, the Government shall file a more complete response to the motion to stay. Petitioner may file a reply on or before March 6, 2020. The Clerk is directed to RE-NOTE petitioner's emergency motion (Dkt. #8 ) for March 6, 2020. Signed by Judge James L. Robart for the Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (TH)
February 14, 2020 Filing 11 DECLARATION of Neil Schaefer filed by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William P Barr, Lowell Clark re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order for Stay of Removal and Release from Custody (Johnson, Kristin)
February 14, 2020 Filing 10 DECLARATION of Kristin B. Johnson filed by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William P Barr, Lowell Clark re #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order for Stay of Removal and Release from Custody (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Johnson, Kristin)
February 14, 2020 Filing 9 RESPONSE, by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William P Barr, Lowell Clark, to #8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order for Stay of Removal and Release from Custody. (Johnson, Kristin)
February 13, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order for Stay of Removal and Release from Custody, filed by Petitioner Alieu Jatta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order) Noting Date 2/13/2020, (Pauw, Robert)
February 7, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kristin Berger Johnson on behalf of Respondents Nathalie Asher, William P Barr, Lowell Clark. (Johnson, Kristin)
February 7, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Return, filed by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William P Barr, Lowell Clark. Noting Date 3/6/2020, (Johnson, Kristin)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FOR RETURN AND STATUS REPORT re #1 2241 Petition by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Electronic posting of this Order and petitioner's 2241 habeas petition shall effect service on the United States Attorney and respondent(s). Within 30 days of the date this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report and note it for the fourth Friday after it is filed. Petitioner may file a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter. Respondent(s) may file a reply not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. (ST)
December 30, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE to Withdraw Pending Motion re #2 MOTION to Stay Removal ; by Petitioner Alieu Jatta. (Pauw, Robert)
December 27, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Intent to Oppose the Motion for Emergency Restraining Order ; filed by Respondents Nathalie Asher, William P Barr, Lowell Clark. (Johnson, Kristin)
December 27, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Stay Removal, filed by Petitioner Alieu Jatta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order) Noting Date 12/27/2019, (Pauw, Robert) Modified on 12/27/2019 Motion documents regenerated to AUSA(SG).
December 27, 2019 Filing 1 2241 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # 0981-6065290), filed by Alieu Jatta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pauw, Robert) Modified on 12/27/2019 - Petition documents regenerated to AUSA(SG).
December 27, 2019 Judge Barbara J. Rothstein and Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (SG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jatta v. Clark et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nathalie Asher
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lowell Clark
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William P Barr
Represented By: US Attorney Habeas
Represented By: Kristin Berger Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alieu Jatta
Represented By: Robert Pauw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?