Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Krysten Garner v. Warren Baltes, et al
as 23-10130
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KRYSTEN GARNER
Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN BALTES, JUSTIN MOCK, LOWELL CLARK and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
GARNER v. JAMERSON et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
KRYSTEN GARNER
Defendant:
ANTONIA JAMERSON, WARREN BALTES, JUSTIN MOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62764
Plaintiff:
LOWELL CLARKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alieu Jatta v. Lowell Clark, et al
as 21-35083
Respondent:
LOWELL CLARK, Warden of Northwest Detention Center, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and NATHALIE ASHER, Tacoma Field Office Director Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
ALIEU JATTA
Javier Martinez v. Lowell Clark, et al
as 21-35023
Respondent / Appellee:
NATHALIE ASHER, Tacoma Field Office Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAVIER MARTINEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00840
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00780
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00654
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
