Khoo v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
| Philip Khoo |
| T-Mobile USA Inc and John Does 1-25 |
| 2:2022cv00132 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Other Fraud |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0101 Federal Communications Act of 1934 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting Parties' #9 Stipulated MOTION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to 5/6/2022. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour.(SR)
|
| Filing 9 Stipulated MOTION and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendant T-Mobile USA Inc. Noting Date 3/28/2022, (Herd, Rachel) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant T-Mobile USA Inc mailed on 2/4/2022 (Davidovskiy, Boris) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Gabriel Traber at gabriel_traber@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 5/6/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 5/13/2022, Joint Status Report due by 5/20/2022. (GT) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Stephen M Rummage on behalf of Defendant T-Mobile USA Inc. (Rummage, Stephen) |
| Attorney Rachel H Herd added for T-Mobile USA Inc; per #6 Notice of Appearance. (SR) |
| Filing 5 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) T-Mobile USA Inc. (SR) |
| Filing 4 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS by Plaintiff Philip Khoo (Davidovskiy, Boris) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Summons Form Incomplete - Wrong Plaintiff Listed.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (JWC) |
| U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (JWC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND Attorney Boris Davidovskiy added to party Philip Khoo(pty:pla), filed by Philip Khoo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Davidovskiy, Boris) (No Fee Required Fee Paid, Receipt #WAWDC-7427977) Modified on 2/4/2022 to add receipt number (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
