Cases 1 - 10 of 1,226
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00419
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00008
Petitioner:
William Rose
Respondent:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Telsync Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BRUCE v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 2:2024cv05721
Petitioner:
NELSON L. BRUCE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Interested Party:
REV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and TRANS UNION, LLC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
