D'Abbracci v. Reid et al
| Dana D'Abbracci |
| Brent J Reid, Jacob J Merrill, Curt Carlson, Jonathan J Krajcar, Jared Jordan, Nancy Roach, Mariette Lopez, Hamadi Sisawo, Troy Cole, Savannah Sprouse, Crocker, Guerrero, McAllister, Martin, Ryan E Becklean, Jestin David Peckinpaugh and Aaron Peterson Osborn |
| 2:2022cv01738 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| S Kate Vaughan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Plaintiff Dana D'Abbracci has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (JF) |
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) All Defendants (MJV) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment sent to plaintiff via USPS. (MJV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Ryan E Becklean, Curt Carlson, Troy Cole, Crocker, Guerrero, Jared Jordan, Jonathan J Krajcar, Mariette Lopez, Martin, McAllister, Jacob J Merrill, Jestin David Peckinpaugh, Aaron Peterson Osborn, Brent J Reid, Nancy Roach, Hamadi Sisawo, Savannah Sprouse with JURY DEMAND (Receipt #200000820), filed by Dana D'Abbracci. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons)(MJV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
