Clark v. T-Mobile US Inc et al
| Stephan Clark |
| T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile US Inc and T-Mobile USA Inc |
| 2:2023cv00103 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER granting Parties' #21 Stipulated MOTION to Stay Case Pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Ruling on the Pending Motion to Transfer. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SS)
|
| Filing 21 Stipulated MOTION and [Proposed] Order to Stay Case Pending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Ruling on the Pending Motion to Transfer, filed by Defendants T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc. Noting Date 3/15/2023, (Tsuji, Lauren) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER re #17 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Donald Houser for Defendants T-Mobile US Inc and T-Mobile USA Inc by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER re #16 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Kristine McAlister Brown for Defendants T-Mobile US Inc and T-Mobile USA Inc by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
| Filing 17 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Donald Houser FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7887950 (Tsuji, Lauren) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Kristine McAlister Brown FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7887948 (Tsuji, Lauren) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Motion to Transfer MDL to the Western District of Washington; filed by Plaintiff Stephan Clark. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibits) (LH) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. In addition to the requirements articulated in FRCP 26(f)(3), the Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Kadya Peter at kadya_peter@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/23/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/30/2023, Joint Status Report due by 4/6/2023. (KMP) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting Parties' #13 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time to Answer Complaint. The deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended through 3/22/2023. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SS)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION and Order to Extend Time to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendants T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc. Noting Date 2/7/2023, (Tsuji, Lauren) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent T-Mobile US, Inc. for T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc (Tsuji, Lauren) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Lauren Jeffers Tsuji on behalf of Defendants T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc. (Tsuji, Lauren) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour for all further proceedings. Hon. Michelle L. Peterson no longer assigned to case. (TF) |
| Filing 9 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant T-Mobile US Inc (CR) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Norman E Siegel for Plaintiff Stephan Clark, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Steven M Nathan for Plaintiff Stephan Clark, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney James J Pizzirusso for Plaintiff Stephan Clark, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Norman E. Siegel FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Stephan Clark (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7864168 (Laufenberg, Cari) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Steven M. Nathan FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Stephan Clark (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7864164 (Laufenberg, Cari) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY James J. Pizzirusso FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Stephan Clark (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7864154 (Laufenberg, Cari) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) T-Mobile US Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc (CR) Modified on 1/27/2023 to reflect T-Mobile USA summons. T-Mobile US Inc summons to be issued (CR). |
| Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (CR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7861721) Attorney Cari Campen Laufenberg added to party Stephan Clark(pty:pla), filed by Stephan Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons T-Mobile US, Inc., #3 Summons T-Mobile USA, Inc.)(Laufenberg, Cari) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/25/2023 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
