Jones v. A Place For Mom et al
| Cortez Daundre Jones |
| A Place For Mom, Behavioral Health, Share Care and Virginia Mason |
| 2:2023cv01362 |
| September 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail addressed to Cortez Daundre Jones returned as Undeliverable re #3 Letter to Filer. (SS) |
Filing 5
ORDER adopting #4 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's IFP application (dkt. #1 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the applicable filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is signed. If Plaintiff fails to pay the fee, the Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (CR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Cortez Daundre Jones before Judge Michelle L. Peterson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 PROPOSED Complaint) (CR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
