Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Jones v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Kathleen O'Toole, Lisa O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Amazon et al
as 2:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Amazon, Jeffrey Preston Jorgensen, Andrew R Jassy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Warner Music Group et al
as 2:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Warner Music Group, Elana Caplan and Angela Caplan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Sharecare et al
as 2:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Sharecare, Behavioral Health and Mendy Freeman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. A Place For Mom et al
as 2:2023cv01362
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
A Place For Mom, Behavioral Health, Share Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Virginia Mason
as 2:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Virginia Mason
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Behavioral Health et al
as 2:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Behavioral Health, Wolfgang Varela, A Place For Mom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Lotte Hotels
as 2:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Lotte Hotels
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Bob Ferguson, Satya Nadella, Koda Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Seattle City Hall et al
as 2:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Seattle City Hall, Seattle Police Department and Adrian Diaz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
