Jones v. Warner Music Group et al
Cortez Daundre Jones |
Warner Music Group, Elana Caplan and Angela Caplan |
2:2023cv01424 |
September 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Tana Lin |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail addressed to Cortez Daundre Jones returned as Undeliverable re #3 Letter. (MJV) |
***Civil Case Terminated. Plaintiff failed to pay filing fee as directed by the Court re #5 Order on Report and Recommendation. (MJV)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting #4 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $402.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If the filing fee is not paid, this case will be administratively closed. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc plaintiff via USPS) (RE) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge S. Kate Vaughan filed by Cortez Daundre Jones. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.